Informational Warfare’s Blog

Just another WordPress.com weblog

Gatekeeper Cockburn (and Counterpunch) is at it again mocking the 9/11 Truth Movement and JFK Conspiracy Theorists

http://911blogger.com/node/18932
http://counterpunch.org/cockburn12262008.html

“Conspiracism is raising its Medusa’s head again, her lethal visage wreathed with hissing absurdities, immobilizing judgement, melting intellect to pumice.”

–Alexander Cockburn (ignoring all evidence that is contrary to his irrational biases)
Blather at new heights of cognitive dissonance over at CounterPunch this weekend. Cockburn uses the term “conspiracism”, as if that were a real thing, to mock any and all comers, even in a piece about the minutiae of some Wall Street fraud (Bernie Madoff). But how can he get away with this childish mocking about the JFK assassination, without having to address even one piece of evidence at all? Here is the entirety of what Cockburn says about “conspiracism” and the JFK assassination in that piece:
“Journalist Russ Baker suggests in a new book, Family of Secrets: The Bush Dynasty, the Powerful Forces That Put It In The White House, And What Their Influence Means for America, “the strong possibility” (I quote from a respectful resume of his conclusions) that the 41st president, G.H.W.Bush, father of the present resident at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, “was involved in assassinating President Kennedy, and that Bush was involved in staging the Watergate break-in (and the break-in at Dan Ellsberg’s psychiatrist’s) with the purpose of having these break-ins exposed and the blame placed on President Nixon. We’re back with the old notion of a secret, all-powerful permanent government, engendered in the WASP-nest of Skull and Bones, headquartered in Langley and locked in alternate collusion and combat with another permanent secret all-powerful government, headquartered in Zion and, if we are to believe the conspiracists, exultant at this hour at the tremendous coup of Bernie Madoff’s supposed victims.”
No, idiot. We’re “back” at looking at shady cia-connected characters and what they were doing in the 1960s and 70s. Cockburn uses Bush’s status as former president as some kind of legal defense which automatically places him on the right side of the law. Quite odd for a left wing, revolutionary rag like CounterPunch. No? You would think, from Cockburn’s tone, that there was no controversy surrounding the JFK assassination. Is that the audience he’s preaching to? Because Noam Chomsky accepts the Warren Commission, that makes it an honest investigation, magic bullet and all? Is that what Cockburn is shoveling?This is beyond ridiculous. Cockburn feels no need to back up anything he says, and like Bill O’Reilly, or Rush Limbaugh, can simply sneer and mock with impunity.The US Congress, by the way, also came to the conclusion that there was most likely a conspiracy to kill Kennedy (while continuing to white-wash and protect the guilty). This was 30 years ago, and yet still to this day, the term “conspiracism” is wielded like a rubber chicken.
587px-medusa_by_carvaggio

Advertisements

December 29, 2008 - Posted by | Uncategorized |

2 Comments »

  1. off with his head… lol

    Comment by Arnold | December 30, 2008 | Reply

  2. added you to my blogroll, i like your posts

    Comment by Arnold | December 30, 2008 | Reply


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: